What is a significant disadvantage of mortar systems compared to other artillery?

The significant disadvantage of mortar systems compared to other artillery is indeed related to their shorter range. Mortars typically have a limited effective range compared to other forms of artillery, such as howitzers and field guns. While mortars are capable of firing at high angles and can deliver rounds indirectly, their maximum range is generally shorter than that of traditional artillery systems, which can effectively engage targets at greater distances.

This limitation can restrict the operational effectiveness of mortar units in certain engagements, particularly in scenarios where engaging distant or well-fortified targets is required. Therefore, when considering the application of different artillery types on the battlefield, the range capability is a critical factor that helps determine the best artillery for specific missions.

While the other options—larger crew size, higher ammunition cost, and less explosive yield—may have some relevance, they do not encapsulate the primary limitation that emerges when comparing mortar systems with other artillery types. Mortars are designed for close support roles, which inherently comes with the trade-off of reduced range compared to heavier artillery.